Monday, December 8, 2014

Friends don't let friends shoot well cocktails


Your alarm goes off at 7:30am.  And shit, it’s Monday. E-mails are filling up your inbox from the weekend, your boss has been menstruating since 1982 (men have their cycles, too), and that asshole that you married is still asleep because he has the day off--but will he clean? No, because he’s an “artist.”

Thankfully there’s a Starbucks on your way to work.  That warm morning beverage will get you through until at least lunch, and then by then your day is already half over.  You get in line, and then finally order your drink.  You’ll have a latte, but not mixed together.  No, you want the two shots of espresso on the side with a back of 10oz of steamed milk.  Is it practical, and does it make sense to drink it that way? No.

But in bars ordering a well shot of something with a back is becoming more and more popular, even though it’s often the same price (or only 50 cents cheaper).  Does it taste nearly as good as the actual cocktail? No! So why are the kids doing it?

Well first off, WHY would ANYONE ever order a WELL shot?

It’s one to order a house-level cocktail, like your basic gin and tonic or vodka soda… but why would you order shot of rum with a coke back?  Well-level cocktails are priced as the cheapest hard A beverages to order for a reason.  They’re made for mixers.  So unless you’re at a classier joint where “well” or “house” is at least Stoli or Bombay, you’re probably not going to enjoy the taste.

The two most logical explanations for the straight well shot option are price and the want to get buzzed or drunk.  If that is the case, then newer should start researching the many great shooters that, for usually the same low price, won’t leave an awful taste in your mouth.

Some great options include:

Sex on the Beach – this classic shooter or cocktail promises both great taste and results.  While there are multiple variations, the basic Sex on the Beach is: Vodka, peach schnapps, OJ and cranberry.  Some bars will charge an extra $1 for the peach schnapps, but it’s worth it to not be cringing after consumption.  For the same price as a shot of vodka, order it as a “madras” (w/o peach schnapps)

Kamikaze – I personally like my kazi’s with flavored vodkas, like blueberry or cucumber—and don’t underestimate how amazing it is with a potato vodka! Again, it’s another simple alternative to the straight shot:  vodka, muddled limes, and triple sec.

Jolly Rancher – Of the well-level shots, this is a fan favorite.  At basics it is: vodka, pineapple, and a flavored liquor (go with the watermelon!)

The Tequila rule:  tequila is a little different, because tequila is usually meant to be shot.  Even so, you’re cutting it with a salted rim and a lime or orange.  If you hate straight tequila, try it with a splash of a mixer to cut the taste.  You’ll be amazed what the little extras can do!

And bros, don’t be afraid to try any of these.  It won’t make you any less “cool”

If you don’t want mixed shots, another way to improve the quality of the taste is to order your shots “chilled.”  By doing this, the bartender will then shake it with ice.  It’ll water down your shot a little bit, but not by much, and drastically improve the flavor.  You can also have for muddled lemons or limes to cut the flavor, but if there’s a line behind you, bartenders generally don’t like you to do this.

Another way to get around the bad taste is to not order well-level shots.  Odds are, if it’s not happy hour, the price for higher level liquor is only a couple dollars more.  I don’t know about you, but I’d much rather spend $2 on premium liquor that’ll taste good and reduce my chances for a hangover over the hand sanitizer and sludge that they bottle and mass produce for $7 a bottle.

The point is, whether you’re at a lounge, a club, or just getting a drink with a friend, you should never be paying for something that’s gonna make you cringe.  You wouldn’t spend money on a dinner that you know you’re gonna hate, and drinks should be no different.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Yippers: How to deal with a bad Yelp review


Yelp was created with the best of intentions:  to help the public find the best businesses in their area based on the reviews and star ratings by the customers of the businesses themselves.  Unfortunately, when you give the public a voice, their voice isn’t always the most unbiased, fair, or even tactful. 

Sometimes these reviews are warranted.  After all, Yelp was created to highlight what some businesses are doing well while pointing out what and why others are failing. 

However, sometimes a lot is lost in the details.  Maybe that food took a half hour because the restaurant was understaffed, or maybe that bartender was brooding because he was recently dumped.  Everyone has their bad days, but that doesn’t mean that they deserve to be crucified by an angry customer because their off day was an inconvenience to them.  

That said, for those of you who do Yelp, I strongly advise for you to go someone at least two or three times before making a solid opinion if you’re going to be negative.  And if you go to give a scathing review about a certain individual, I would strongly suggest taking other avenues instead, such as talking to a manager.

Unfortunately, like trolls in blogging, Yelp has its fair share of Yippers (or, at least that’s what I call them).  Yippers are the obnoxious underbelly of the review world.  They’re usually anonymous and get a satisfaction in having their voice heard while they passive-aggressively bring others down.  They’re like that inside ring of a toilet bowl:  you can’t see it or how dirty it is, but you know it’s there.

Nearly everyone in the industry has been the victim of a “yipping”.  I once had someone “yip” that I was giving free drinks away to customers.  Unbeknownst to them, these “free beverages” were purchased with drink tickets that this “yipper” didn’t notice that I’d been collecting.  Did I still have to explain that to the owners of the bar?  Yes.  Did it piss me off that some passive-aggressive jackass or jackassette that knew nothing else about me felt the need to Yelp about it anonymously instead of approaching my manager (who was on duty at the time) where they would’ve received their answers?  Yes.  The review hurt our bar’s rating.  It made me look bad for like, two seconds, and it was about as frustrating as an itch on the inside of a cast.

Business owners are usually used to seeing these kind of Yippers spamming their Yelp pages with reviews created by the scrapings of hateful talons on keyboards.  Sometimes they’ll respond, other times they’ll ignore it.  If their review is justified, you might have to answer for your actions—but if it’s not a common occurrence, you shouldn’t receive too much of a backlash.  If it IS a common occurrence, then what the customers may be right about you, and you should figure out how to fix the problem.

As a member of the industry, all you can really do is chalk it up to a bad experience or say to yourself that “that person was just a pretentious asshole” and move on with your life.  Your regulars are your regulars for a reason.  They’re there not just for the drinks or food, but for the experience and the role that you play in it.

The majority of the reviews will be the ones that make the difference.  It’s easier to notice that one bad review because it’s different than the ten good ones. 

As for the idea of the concept of Yelp, it has proven to be a successful tool in effecting the development of a business.  A Harvard Business School study in 2011 found that each “star” on Yelp affected the business owner’s sales by 5%-9%, while a 2012 study done by two Berkeley economists found that an increase from 3.5 to 4 stars on Yelp resulted in a 19% increase in the chances of a restaurant being booked during peak hours. 

Harvard:

Berkeley:


Every business has its flaws and every person has their bad days, but luckily, since Yelp usually has multiple reviewers that come in on different days and have differing experiences, the Yippers are the outliers of an otherwise working and more socially engaging way of reviewing… as long as it’s handled responsibly. 

Tuesday, December 2, 2014